From: "Hamaker, Charles" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 01:15:36 +0000

Alicia I think you are missing the point. Elsevier copyright practices
and author license files if they are no better or worse than anyone
else's in the industry can't support widespread takedown notices with
final and definitive proof of copyright ownership.  But the penalties
if you claim ownership I.e. Takedown rights absent proof are about
non-existent, if I understand the DMC correctly.

Regards
Chuck Hamaker
UN Charlotte


-------- Original message --------

From: "Wise, Alicia (ELS-OXF)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:06:45 +0000

Hi there,

I'm very happy to look into this.  To get started it would be really
helpful if Bob Persing could provide a little more information -
ideally the DOI for the article in question, or else the name of the
article and the journal.  In the interests of our moderator's good
humor, and everyone's email load, could I suggest that he and I work
on bottoming this out offline and then we can report back on what we
find.  (Bob, if this is agreeable to you, my email address is
[log in to unmask]).

With kind wishes,

Alicia


Dr Alicia Wise
Director of Access and Policy
Elsevier I The Boulevard I Langford Lane I Kidlington I Oxford I OX5 1GB
M: +44 (0) 7823 536 826 I E: [log in to unmask]
Twitter: @wisealic