LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Apr 2015 20:06:52 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
From: Winston Tabb <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 23:24:35 +0000

The language would apply to any exception, such as ILL, not just to
fair use. It is one of the key elements of our "ask" at WIPO

Winston

*************

From: Ann Okerson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:51 PM

Winston, I could see this being worth a try for licenses originating
in the US, but could it work for resources coming from other
countries, where fair use isn't part of the copyright system, and so
fair use would not be well understood by either the originating
publisher or the licensing library?   Thanks much for thinking out of
the box here, Ann

***********

From: Winston Tabb <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 14:00:40 +0000

The single most useful thing we could do is insist that license
language include a provision that the license terms do not supersede
provisions of the US copyright act.

Winston Tabb/Johns Hopkins

ATOM RSS1 RSS2