LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Jun 2014 02:52:45 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
From: Rick Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:24:51 +0000

>If that were the case, then some books presumably would have sold ONLY
>to libraries.

No, that doesn¹t follow. A book that "virtually no one needs to use or
wants to read" may be purchased by a bunch of libraries and a handful of
individuals. "Virtually no one" is an intentionally imprecise phrase. The
question isn¹t whether these books are completely useless to everyone in
the world. The question is whether they offer enough value to a large
enough number of people to justify the cost and effort of publishing them
in the traditional way.

---
Rick Anderson
Assoc. Dean for Scholarly Resources & Collections
Marriott Library, University of Utah
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2