LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Feb 2012 20:18:25 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
From: CHARLES OPPENHEIM <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:52:32 +0000

One possible explanation for low take up - I tried to log into to the
web page for signing and was told it was unobtainable!

Charles

Professor Charles Oppenheim
________________________________
From: Les A Carr <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, 3 February 2012, 9:37

So far only 3300 people have signed the petition (385 per day in the
last week), so it doesn't seem to be taking off in a significant way.

>From the UK's perspective, there have been 159 signatories all told from 27 institutions. Having checked the 28 signatories from the most represented institution I can reveal (to almost no-one's surprise) that they are not only "not reviewing", "not publishing" and "not doing editorial work", they are also "not using their IR" (only 5 have ever put anything in their repository).

(Disclaimer: I haven't checked websites, Mendeley, arxiv or other
sources of OA, and neither have I checked whether all the signatories
are PhD students / undergraduates or others.)
--
Les Carr

ATOM RSS1 RSS2