LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Nov 2015 19:33:57 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
From: Anna Creech <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 09:14:23 -0500

Thank you all for confirming my thoughts on this. The publisher
responded that this line was included in error and a revised amendment
was sent.

Anna

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:48 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> From: Anna Creech <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:22:34 -0400
>
> I'm working with a publisher on an amendment that would permit us to send copies of articles via ILL (the standard license does not), and they have included the following line:
>
> "Licensee warrants that... Licensee will not make articles available to any other library, database, or service that provides document delivery or ILL services without the express written consent of Publisher"
>
>
> My interpretation is that we cannot send articles via ILL to any institution that offers ILL services without written consent from the Publisher each time, which would pretty much negate the point of having the ILL amendment added in the first place. Am I misunderstanding the language here?
>
> I've asked them for clarification, but I wanted to share this in case someone else has had this experience and could illuminate.
>
> Anna

ATOM RSS1 RSS2