LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 25 Jan 2016 19:22:51 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
From: Jeff Saffer <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 19:17:08 +0000

Our company, Quertle, released Quetzal® Search and Communication
(www.quetzal-search.info) last May and began providing institutional
access.  We have been asked by a number of subscribing institutions to
use SERU, which we have done.  But, it seems that the terms of SERU
are mainly geared toward content, rather than search engines.

Are there standard license terms like SERU that are commonly used for
licensing search engines?

Some background on our product: Quetzal is focused on life and
biomedical sciences and covers a wide range of content including
PubMed, NIH Grants Applications, Patents, and much more. You may be
asking yourself, “Why another search engine?”  It’s because with
existing search methods, including expensive “advanced” engines,
researchers continue to miss critical documents.  If you are curious
about Quetzal, contact us
(www.quetzal-search.info/pages/contact.shtml) for a 5 minute
demonstration. We are truly different and think you may find a demo of
our Quantum Logic Linguistics search enlightening.

Thank you for any information you can provide,

Jeff Saffer
Quertle LLC
702-940-9897

ATOM RSS1 RSS2