LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:43:54 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
From: Sean Andrews <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:49:42 -0600

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:28 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> From: Joseph Esposito <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:44:03 -0800
>
> Much to argue over on this issue, and people will argue, but it does
> in the end seem to me to be a contract dispute, not a broader issue of
> copyright.

But these two things are not mutually exclusive: it becomes an issue
of copyright as a social and cultural norm if the internecine web of
contracts makes it impossible to create any legal and economically
sustainable (both in energy and money) to create a business or
distribution system using current technological possibilities.  In any
case, this is a very interesting development, if only to expose
another layer of ambiguity in this situation.

Thanks for your comments and for David's passing it along.

Sean

ATOM RSS1 RSS2