Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:43:54 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
From: Sean Andrews <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:49:42 -0600
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:28 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> From: Joseph Esposito <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:44:03 -0800
>
> Much to argue over on this issue, and people will argue, but it does
> in the end seem to me to be a contract dispute, not a broader issue of
> copyright.
But these two things are not mutually exclusive: it becomes an issue
of copyright as a social and cultural norm if the internecine web of
contracts makes it impossible to create any legal and economically
sustainable (both in energy and money) to create a business or
distribution system using current technological possibilities. In any
case, this is a very interesting development, if only to expose
another layer of ambiguity in this situation.
Thanks for your comments and for David's passing it along.
Sean
|
|
|