LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:42:50 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
From: "Bergan, Rachel" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 08:42:33 +0000

*Apologies for cross-posting*

Earlier this year we asked over 2,500 researchers around the world for
their views on a range of scholarly communication issues, including
their publishing habits, opinions about different licenses, and the
impact of scenarios for realizing an open access future.

Released for Open Access Week, the survey results reveal that while
researchers are clearly in favor of widening access to research, they
remain largely unaware of the initiatives and services that have been
established to encourage growth of OA.

There is also little consensus when it comes to permitting reuse of
published research and it is still a minority who are archiving
manuscripts in repositories (green OA). The results demonstrate that
there’s much more publishers, librarians, funders, and all open access
advocates need to do to raise researchers’ awareness of the OA options
available to them.

Download a free copy of the survey report at: http://bit.ly/TFResearcherSurvey

Kind regards,

Rachel Bergan

Taylor & Francis Group
Information Classification: General

ATOM RSS1 RSS2