LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:48:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
From: Scott Stangroom <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:05:56 -0400

My guess is the private equity firm will become overleveraged and then
bail once they've taken their plunder from Springer.  Among other
things, it looks like they're counting on, quote: "high-growth areas
such as open access publishing", for future profit.  Talk about
putting lipstick on a pig.

Scott Stangroom
Acquisitions Coordinator
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
W.E.B. Du Bois Library
Acquisitions Dept.
Amherst, MA 01003-9275
[log in to unmask]

-----Original Message-----

From: Ann Shumelda Okerson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:11:12 -0400

See the newest about Springer, 3.3B euros - headed not to an IPO but
to a private equity firm:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/19/springerscience-sale-idUSL5N0EV0Q720130619

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-19/bc-partners-to-buy-springer-science-for-4-4-billion.html

Any tea leaves to be read here?  What might one expect form the "new"
Springer?

Ann

ATOM RSS1 RSS2