LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 30 Jul 2017 20:54:06 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
From: Ari Belenkiy <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 23:22:18 -0700

The article provides important data.

The major finding is how many scientific articles exist at the moment
- 80 million.

The second finding is that 31% of all articles are vain - no one is
interested in them.

I also reserve a question. The author claims that if the Sci-Hub
server is discovered, the problem is resolved. Is it that difficult to
discover it?

Ari Belenkiy

Vancouver BC
Canada

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 6:42 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> From: "Jim O'Donnell" <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:53:28 -0700
>
> An article in Science (appearing there makes it important) makes a striking prognosis about the future of journal publication.  No comment!
>
> http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/07/sci-hub-s-cache-pirated-papers-so-big-subscription-journals-are-doomed-data-analyst
>
> Jim O'Donnell
> ASU

ATOM RSS1 RSS2