LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 Aug 2013 17:31:49 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
From: Iris Brest <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 13:11:31 -0700

Sandy -- They will be the version of accepted articles post peer review.

9. What version of their article should Faculty submit to the repository?

The policy requires that the author submit the "final version", which
safely means the manuscript copy post-peer review but before a
publisher typesets and finalizes it.

Iris Brest/Stanford University


-----Original Message-----

From: Sandy Thatcher <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 22:59:52 -0500

> All research publications
> covered by the policy will continue to be subjected to rigorous peer
> review; they will still appear in the most prestigious journals across
> all fields; and they will continue to meet UC's standards of high
> quality.

Just wondering if the "standards of high quality" include high quality
in copyediting? Will UC be paying to have the accepted articles
copyedited before they are posted in eScholarship? If not, how can
this promise of "high quality" be made? Does UC think copyediting not
important? Do all UC faculty write pristine prose that is free of
errors?

Sandy Thatcher

ATOM RSS1 RSS2