LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 13 May 2012 23:21:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
From: Ann Shumelda Okerson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 23:12:37 -0400

See also this useful summary by James Grimmelmann:

http://laboratorium.net/archive/2012/05/13/inside_the_georgia_state_opinion

"My bottom line on the case is that it’s mostly a win for Georgia
State and mostly a loss for the publishers. The big winner is CCC. It
gains leverage against universities for coursepack and e-reserve
copying with a bright-line rule, and it gains leverage against
publishers who will be under much more pressure to participate in its
full panoply of licenses."

ATOM RSS1 RSS2