LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 7 Apr 2013 04:38:40 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
From: Joseph Esposito <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 06:43:31 -0400

I strongly urge you to put a copy of your work in the file for the
tenure and promotion committee.

Joe Esposito


On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 5:04 AM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: Heather Morrison <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 11:30:46 -0700
>
> Since releasing the March 31, 2013 (not 3013) Dramatic Growth of Open
> Access yesterday at midnight, I've received two responses requiring
> substantive corrections and clarifications and one noting typos. All
> the changes have been made.
>
> Can this now be considered a peer-reviewed blogpost? Should I put a
> copy in the file for the tenure & promotion committee?
>
> Here is the blogpost in question - further review welcome:
> http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.ca/2013/04/dramatic-growth-of-open-access-3013.html
>
> best,
>
> Dr. Heather Morrison
> Freedom for scholarship in the internet age
> http://summit.sfu.ca/item/12537

ATOM RSS1 RSS2