From: Tim Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 11:43:47 -0500

Ours wasn't great ... we've only done it three times -- one with what
you'd probably consider a large publisher (Dun & Bradstreet) ... we
started with our "standard agreement" which was based on the
California Digital Library's template ... the vendor gutted most of it
and tried to substitute their standard language which we in turn
redlined ... in the end the Frankenstein's monster of a license looked
quite different from our standard.  That said, it was still as good a
place to start as any!

Best of luck!

Tim

Tim Rogers
Executive Director
NC LIVE
E: [log in to unmask]
W: http://www.nclive.org


On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:46 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: "Mihlrad, Leigh (NIH/OD/ORS) [E]" <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 17:09:12 -0500
>
> Good afternoon,
>
> I was curious if anyone has had success with any of the larger
> companies (Elsevier, Wiley, Springer, Nature Pub Group, etc) in terms
> of presenting them with [your library’s] standard license as a
> negotiation starting point?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Leigh Mihlrad
> Electronic Resource Management Librarian
> National Institutes of Health (NIH) Library
> Office of Research Services
> [log in to unmask]
> http://nihlibrary.nih.gov