LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Nov 2017 16:51:49 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (51 lines)
From: Kai Karin Geschuhn <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 08:52:08 +0000

++Apologies for cross-posting++

Dear colleagues,

May I draw your attention to a recent UKSG Insights article on the
requirements for offsetting agreements in terms of their strategic
goal and the necessary workflow improvements:

Geschuhn, K. & Stone, G., (2017). It’s the workflows, stupid! What is
required to make ‘offsetting’ work for the open access transition.
Insights. 30(3), pp.103–114. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.391

The paper makes the case for stronger engagement of libraries and
consortia when it comes to negotiating and drafting offsetting
agreements. Two workshops organized by the Efficiencies and Standards
for Article Charges (ESAC) initiative in 2016 and 2017 have shown a
clear need for an improvement of the current workflows and processes
between academic institutions (and libraries) and the publishers they
use in terms of author identification, metadata exchange and
invoicing. Publishers need to invest in their editorial systems, while
institutions need to get a clearer understanding of the strategic goal
of offsetting. To this purpose, strategic and practical elements,
which should be included in the agreements, will be introduced.
Firstly, the Joint Understanding of Offsetting, launched in 2016, will
be discussed. This introduces the ‘pay-as-you-publish’ model as a
transitional pathway for the agreements. Secondly, this paper proposes
a set of recommendations for article workflows and services between
institutions and publishers, based on a draft document which was
produced as part of the 2nd ESAC Offsetting Workshop in March 2017.
These recommendations should be seen as a minimum set of practical and
formal requirements for offsetting agreements and are necessary to
make any publication-based open access business model work.

Best regards,

Kai Geschuhn

Ms. Kai Karin Geschuhn
Innovative Services & Open Access
Max Planck Digital Library
Amalienstraße 33 | 80799 München
Phone +49 (0) 89 38602 253
Fax +49 (0) 89 38602 290

[log in to unmask]
www.mpdl.mpg.de
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5849-8751

ATOM RSS1 RSS2