LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:50:06 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
From: Richard Poynder <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 19:41:18 +0100

In a recent investment report, analyst Claudio Aspesi concluded that a
new front had opened up in the Open Access (OA) debate. Writing in
April, Aspesi noted that academics are “increasingly protesting the
limitations to the usage of the information and data contained in the
articles published through subscription models, and — in particular —
to the practice of text mining articles.”  Aspesi is right, and a
central figure in this battleground is University of Cambridge chemist
Peter Murray-Rust. A long-time advocate for open data, Murray-Rust is
now spearheading an initiative to draft a “Content Mining
Declaration”. What is the background to this?

http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/new-declaration-of-rights-open-content.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2