LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:56:25 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
From: Sandy Thatcher <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:04:32 -0500

Perhaps this throws some light (or yet more darkness) on the question?

http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2012/10/23/but-why-would-amazon-wipe-your-kindle-to-protect-amazon/

Sandy Thatcher


> From: Sally Morris <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 22:59:42 +0100
>
> German copyright law does not allow, as English and US law do, for the
> type of clause that assigns future rights that have not yet been
> invented.  Hence it would not have been possible for the original
> contracts for those books to include electronic rights
>
> Sally Morris
> South House, The Street, Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex, UK  BN13 3UU
> Email:  [log in to unmask]
>
> ________________________________
> From: Joseph Esposito <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 19:08:45 -0400
>
> All interests are indeed aligned.  That doesn't mean the situation
> will change anytime soon.  I don't know the particulars of the volume
> you referenced, but for many books, in any language, the problem is
> the retrospective clearing of rights.  It has a big administrative
> cost. (This is also the primary reason for the orphan works problem.)
> There are also different rights issues for print and electronic books.
>
> A couple years ago I worked with a client that had set up a
> French-language Web site for academic titles.  It was print only.  50%
> of the sales for that site came from outside France.
>
> Joe Esposito
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:24 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>>  From: Jim O'Donnell <[log in to unmask]>
>> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 21:54:16 +0200
>>
>> Joe, I have to count your response a worthy effort, though this title was but one example of various German books I've tried to buy over a period of time.  Suhrkamp has no objection or difficulty whatsoever in selling the print editions of these books in German over the Internet, whether through Amazon.de or buch.de or other sites, around the world to all comers, no questions asked.  I don't think German language authors very often find publishers in other countries clamoring for the rights to publish them *in German* in those countries.  So whatever restriction is being imagined here is fresh and new to e-books:  I grant you it may be the result of interpreting some clause like "all rights not expressly granted are hereby tied up in a way disadvantageous to author, publisher, booksellers, and readers for all eternity".  Probably shouldn't sign such clauses.
>>
>>  But the real point to me is that Amazon wants to dominate the universe with innovative and successful retail.  Making this an issue and fixing it would be a good cause for international understanding.  I'm eccentric, an American who reads German for pleasure.  But there are native speakers of German living in the US and Bahrain and China who would love to get books in their language through the magic network.  But if they don't have an address and a credit card in Germany (or likely Switzerland or Austria), they're out of luck too.  And my colleagues who teach German would like to have their students improve their German would also love to be able to have them get books easily.  Germanophone governments, publishers, authors, and other cultural institutions would love to have more people around the world working on improving their German.  ALL INTERESTS ARE ALIGNED HERE.  Is the problem only that nobody's found a smart lawyer yet?
>>
>>  Jim O'Donnell

ATOM RSS1 RSS2