LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:02:02 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
From: Kevin Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:41:44 +0000

I hope I am more of a pragmatist (one could say cynic) than to commit
myself wholeheartedly to only one option.  I am generally in favor of
whatever will further progress in particular circumstances.  But my
main point was than even "real" mandates, whatever that means, for
Green OA (like the Harvard license, after which Duke's is modeled)
don't force authors to publish in specified journals.  Authors can
still submit to any journal they think is right for them; they are
just also giving a non-exclusive license to the institution to deposit
the final version of the article in a repository.

Kevin L. Smith, J.D.
Director of Scholarly Communication
Duke University Libraries
P.O. Box 90193
Durham, NC 27708

ATOM RSS1 RSS2