LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 22 Oct 2013 18:26:08 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
From: Thomas Krichel <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:49:59 +0000

Fred W. Jenkins, Ph.D. writes

> What is disappointing is that so many OA advocates seem more concerned
> with protecting OA journals than with protecting readers from unreliable
> science.

OA will make it much easier to find out what is reliable science
and what is not. For example, take plaguerism. With OA you simply
run a robot on the available texts. Without it you would also have
to negociate access to the contents. This is very expensive in time.

Cheers,

Thomas Krichel                  http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                            skype:thomaskrichel

ATOM RSS1 RSS2