LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:57:46 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
From: David Prosser <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:43:52 +0000

Unfortunately, this method of looking for triggers above ‘normal’
usage massively inhibits text and data mining.  We are in an era where
‘normal’ and ‘excessive’ need to be redefined.

Dave



On 17 Feb 2016, at 02:18, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

From: "Maher, Stephen" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:21:16 +0000

Hi Richard,

In my experience publishers monitor the rate of downloading from an
institution’s IPs. If the rate exceeds “normal” usage, the publisher
notifies the institution with information of when the excessive
downloading occurred and over which IPs. More often than not the
excessive downloading occurs over the IP address connected to an
institution’s proxy server. The institution then attempts to identify
the username(s) associated with the downloads and temporarily suspends
it.

Hope this helps.

Stephen
Stephen Maher, MSIS
NYU Health Sciences Library

ATOM RSS1 RSS2