LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Mar 2016 18:29:18 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
From: "Maher, Stephen" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 15:49:45 +0000

SciHub is a problem but the short-sighted solution is taking a
whack-a-mole approach to the copyright infringers. A holistic solution
would look at intrinsic and monetary value of scholarly publishing and
reassess the processes.

What if universities (re)prioritized participation in peer-review and
editorial ethics in its determination for faculty appointments and
tenure?  What if university presses published their own STEM journals
akin to Law Schools and their law reviews?

Loving this thread BTW.

Stephen Maher, MSIS
NYU Health Sciences Library

ATOM RSS1 RSS2