LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 Apr 2013 19:13:24 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
From: Linda Wobbe <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:50:58 -0700

For us, acceptable post-cancellation rights are Perpetual Access to
the paid content.  Ideally, from the provider's site.  If not, allow
us to use LOCKSS.

Lots of publishers fail on this point, but we have still moved to
online only for most, anyway.

(An aside, what am I to make of purchased backfiles with no
post-cancellation access rights!)

We are slowly biting the bullet for item # 1  since that includes
Science, Nature, etc - if we don't have those online, we might as well
not have them at all.

#2 We have figured out how to handle the emailed pdf's.  We post them
into ebrary's DASH, and link from the cataloging record.  Of course,
that may not work long-term!

#3. and #4 are our current reasons for retaining print subscriptions.

#5 If a publisher requires print + online.  We toss the print. (OK, we
send it to Absolute Backorder, but we don't keep it).

Which kinds of publishers create problems 2-4?  News and opinion,
popular titles, humanities, religious, independent publishers, etc,
etc.


...Linda

Linda Wobbe/ Head, Collection Management/
Saint Mary's College Library/
Moraga, CA


On 4/10/13 11:58 AM, LIBLICENSE wrote:

> From: Mary Summerfield <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 22:24:40 +0000
>
> What are acceptable forms of post-cancellation rights for e-publications?
>
> Mary Summerfield
> Publications Business Development Manager
> SPIE
> [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2