LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Jun 2017 18:37:47 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
From: "Jim O'Donnell" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 19:01:18 -0700

Jeffrey Beall of the University of Denver has published, in a serious
peer-reviewed journal, an article outlining the history of the
'predatory list' and his views on the landscape of journal publishing.

http://www.biochemia-medica.com/2017/2/273?t=1&cn=ZmxleGlibGVfcmVjcw%3D%3D&iid=c80e62cb81974fa6879b869bb6924837&uid=774480907&nid=244+289476616

This link should work as well:

https://tinyurl.com/ydgy4h39

It is one of five pieces on predatory journals in this special issue
of the journal Biochemia Medica, a distinctive venue.  Here is a link
that should take you to the special issue:

http://www.biochemia-medica.com/node/830

Beall's unorthodoxy is palpable, his arguments vigorous.  His largest
concern is with the damage done to the quality of science by the
profusion of unreliable sources.  He doesn't quite say "fake science!"
but that is the direction in which he points.  Well worth reading.

Jim O'Donnell
ASU

ATOM RSS1 RSS2