LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LIBLICENSE-L Home

LIBLICENSE-L Home

LIBLICENSE-L  December 2014

LIBLICENSE-L December 2014

Subject:

The Open Access Interviews: Richard Savory, Jisc Licensing Manager

From:

LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:51:22 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (45 lines)

From: Richard Poynder <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:49:08 +0000

For the past several decades the research community has been
bedevilled with the so-called serials crisis, the phenomenon by which
the cost of scholarly journals continues to rise at an unsustainable
rate.

One of the most significant responses to this affordability problem
was the open access (OA) movement, which in 2002 coalesced around the
Budapest Open Access Initiative. Open access publishing, OA advocates
have always argued, will be cheaper, and therefore sustainable.

In 2004, confronted by the growing demands of the OA movement, and
faced with competition from open access publishers like BioMed Central
and PLOS, traditional subscription publishers responded with hybrid
OA, which allows authors to continue publishing in subscription
journals but, if they wish, to choose to make a particular paper open
access by paying an article-processing charge (APC). The first such
initiative was Springer’s Open Choice, which at the time the company’s
CEO Derk Haank characterised as a challenge to OA advocates to “put
their money where their mouth is”.

Since hybrid OA APCs are more expensive than those of pure open access
journals (i.e. generally around $3,000 a paper), take up remained low
until research funders like the Wellcome Trust and Research Councils
UK agreed to start paying APCs for their funded authors.

It was quickly apparent however that, as things stood, hybrid OA could
only worsen the affordability problem, since hybrid OA journals now
have not one, but two income streams for the same article — one from
the article-processing charge, another from the journal subscription,
a phenomenon that OA advocates refer to as “double dipping”.

With the government pushing hard for all the research it funds to be
made open access, the issue of double dipping is particularly acute
for UK HEIs, and Jisc, the organisation that negotiates licensing
agreements with publishers on their behalf, has this year been busy
negotiating offsetting agreements with publishers intended to mitigate
or extinguish double dipping.

An interview with Jisc’s Licensing Manager Richard Savory can be read here:

http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/the-open-access-interviews-richard.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options



Archives

March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011

RSS1