LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LIBLICENSE-L Home

LIBLICENSE-L Home

LIBLICENSE-L  February 2015

LIBLICENSE-L February 2015

Subject:

Re: Open Science Initiative issues draft paper & recommendations

From:

LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 16 Feb 2015 20:19:41 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (96 lines)

From: Rick Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:14:12 +0000

I was involved with the online discussion and with the writing of the
document, and I can confirm that it does not represent a consensus view,
but rather the range of views that were expressed over the course of that
discussion.

---
Rick Anderson
Assoc. Dean for Scholarly Resources & Collections
Marriott Library, University of Utah
[log in to unmask]


On 2/16/15, 5:22 PM, "LIBLICENSE" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>From: T Scott Plutchak <[log in to unmask]>
>Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 20:58:07 +0000
>
>I was not involved in the online discussion, but I've spent some time
>going through the report.
>
>The front matter to the report includes the following:
>
>" The 112 participants who signed up to participate in this
>conversation were drawn mostly from the academic, research, and
>library communities. Most of these 112 were not active in this
>conversation, but a healthy diversity of key perspectives was still
>represented.
>
>"Individual participants may not agree with all of the viewpoints
>described herein, but participants agree that this document reflects
>the spirit and content of the conversation.
>
>"This main body of this document was written by Glenn Hampson and
>edited by Joyce Ogburn and Laura Ada Emmett. Additional editorial
>input was provided by many members of the OSI working group. Kathleen
>Shearer is the author of Annex 5, with editing by Dominque Bambini and
>Richard Poynder."
>
>Glenn Hampson is the exec director of nSCI, the organization that
>pulled the OSI working group together.  nSCI, as far as I can tell, is
>largely a one man operation.  From a close reading of the document, I
>gather that the recommendations are less consensus statements and more
>reflections of the breadth of the online discussions among the 20 or
>so active participants.
>
>I thought the report was a pretty good compendium of the current range
>of issues being discussed by those who are concerned with how the
>scholarly communication landscape is changing and it is valuable for
>that reason.  It is certainly worth taking some time to read through
>it, and perhaps consideration of the recommendations will spark some
>useful discussion.
>
>Scott
>
>
>T Scott Plutchak | Director of Digital Data Curation Strategies
>UAB | The University of Alabama at Birmingham
>The Edge of Chaos ­ LHL 427
>http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4712-5233
>uab.edu
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ann Shumelda Okerson <[log in to unmask]>
>Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 16:56:47 -0500
>
>This daft report has appeared from a relatively new organization
>called The Open Science Initiative Working group of the national
>Science Communication Institute.  It doesn't seem possible tell who
>the drafting/editing people were, pulling together from what was
>obviously a much larger conversation.  Apparently a large group of
>thought leaders was invited to join an email dialog.  24 of them chose
>to sign the document and 90 didn't, for whatever reason.  Would be
>interesting to hear more about this report from those who know more.
>
>Meanwhile, the draft (final report to be released in March) highlights
>the diversity in in perceptions about open access.  It recommends 10
>years of high level (productive) conference-based conversations and
>recommends exploring "the world's first all-scholarship repository,"
>stating that work is already in progress about this.
>
>Any more information available about this ASR?
>
>See:
>
>Summary Blog Post
>http://nationalscience.org/nsci-focus-areas/science-writing/2015/open-scie
>nce-initiative-issues-new-paper-recommendations/
>
>Full Text
>http://nationalscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/OSI-report-Feb-2015.
>pdf

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options



Archives

January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011

RSS1