LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LIBLICENSE-L Home

LIBLICENSE-L Home

LIBLICENSE-L  March 2016

LIBLICENSE-L March 2016

Subject:

Re: SciHub

From:

LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 7 Mar 2016 17:24:42 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (35 lines)

From: Gretchen McCord <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 11:03:13 -0600

My concern is with the works that are NOT created because of a law
that simply doesn't fit the current technological world. See the many
CMSI studies finding widespread misunderstanding of copyright law,
particularly fair use, across a range of industries. True, the studies
cite misunderstanding of the law, not bad law per se, but when any law
is so widely misunderstood that the result is undermining of the
original purpose of the law, I say the law at the least badly written
and likely insufficient.

http://www.cmsimpact.org/fair-use

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Gretchen McCord MSIS, JD
[log in to unmask]


On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 11:46 AM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: "Jim O'Donnell" <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 21:13:10 -0700
>
> The simplest thing to say is that the following posting claims that
> "there is no question" and "We all know this" are demonstrated to be
> untrue by this very thread of this conversation.  And if copyright
> were indeed failing to promote the creation of new works and the
> expansion of the body of human knowledge, it's unlikely that there
> would be 47 million articles for SciHub to think worth stealing.  I've
> got something like 46,955,000 of them still to read, myself.
>
> Jim O'Donnell
> ASU

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options



Archives

March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011

RSS1