From: Klaus Graf <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:05:25 +0100

2012/1/10 LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>:

> From: David Prosser <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 12:19:16 +0000
>
> 'Free access' and 'open access' are not synonymous terms.  If they
> were then the framers of the definitions of open access from Budapest
> onwards could have saved their time crafting definitions.  Open access
> is free access plus.  Open access is always free access, but free
> access is not always open access.
>
> What Sandy describes, free reading on screen but nothing else, may be
> valuable, but it is not open access.  It is free access.

I agree. Only libre Access (re-use allowed) is true Open Access.

Klaus Graf