From: Klaus Graf <[log in to unmask]> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:05:25 +0100 2012/1/10 LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>: > From: David Prosser <[log in to unmask]> > Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 12:19:16 +0000 > > 'Free access' and 'open access' are not synonymous terms. If they > were then the framers of the definitions of open access from Budapest > onwards could have saved their time crafting definitions. Open access > is free access plus. Open access is always free access, but free > access is not always open access. > > What Sandy describes, free reading on screen but nothing else, may be > valuable, but it is not open access. It is free access. I agree. Only libre Access (re-use allowed) is true Open Access. Klaus Graf