From: Sandy Thatcher <[log in to unmask]> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:33:45 -0600 I am curious how many librarians today think that e-reserves are limited to just "supplemental" readings. As I understand it, the Georgia State e-reserves case involves materials that were not just assigned as supplemental readings. And were even traditional print reserves limited to supplemental readings only? Sandy Thatcher > From: "Elizabeth E. Kirk" <[log in to unmask]> > > How about the obvious... No one is talking about course packs here > (except the excerpted language from the Harvard Business School Press > (HBSP) terms), as librarians are quite aware that these are a whole > different legal animal from reserves, which are supplemental, not > required, readings.