From: Ken Masters <[log in to unmask]> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:31:56 +0400 Hi All Although I'm usually the last to defend big money publishers, I wonder a little about that blog posting. Yes, it is upsetting when a publisher messes up your paper, especially when it's in print form and can't be fixed. But people, even publishers, are imperfect, and mistakes happen. To suggest "intentional sabotage," wow, that is quite something, unless the author has access to other information that is not shared on the blog. And to call it the "mother-and-father of editing mistakes" - well, I guess the author hasn't seen terribly much in way of editing mistakes. Regards Dr. Ken Masters Asst. Professor: Medical Informatics Medical Education Unit College of Medicine & Health Sciences Sultan Qaboos University Sultanate of Oman E-i-C: The Internet Journal of Medical Education ____/\\/********\\/\\____ On 12 March 2012 11:57, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > From: Klaus Graf <[log in to unmask]> > Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 23:15:20 +0100 > > http://restoration-ecology.blogspot.com/2012/03/elsevier-added-value-story-of-how.html > > Klaus Graf