From: Sally Morris <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 19:42:50 +0100

The same applies to Oxford and Cambridge - at least for their academic
publications (not sure whether it applies to everything on their
lists)

Sally

Sally Morris
South House, The Street, Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex, UK  BN13 3UU
Email:  [log in to unmask]


________________________________
From: Sandy Thatcher <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 10:37:08 -0500

No commercial publisher has a faculty editorial board that is given
the responsibility of reviewing readers' reports and approving
publication of every book proposed by the publishing staff. That is
what I meant by "quality control," Rick, and it is indeed unique to
university presses and is a requirement of their membership in the
AAUP.

Sandy Thatcher


At 2:48 AM -0400 7/4/12, LIBLICENSE wrote:
>
> From: Rick Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 15:46:32 +0000
>
>> All
>> university presses are mandated to have quality control procedures in
>> place for their operations. That is what makes them university
>> presses.
>
>
> Er, no. What makes them university presses is the fact that they're owned
> and run by universities and call themselves university presses. If having
> "quality control procedures in place for their operations" made a
> publisher a university press, then by that definition most (if not all)
> trade publishers would be university presses.
>
> --
> Rick Anderson
> Acting Dean, J. Willard Marriott Library
> University of Utah
> [log in to unmask]