From: David Prosser <[log in to unmask]> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:32:57 +0100 I think I've asked before but how much copyediting does your average (not Nature or Science, but average) scholarly paper get? David On 26 Jul 2012, at 22:43, LIBLICENSE wrote: > From: Sandy Thatcher <[log in to unmask]> > Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:12:48 -0500 > > And one reason "a repository-based infrastructure would be more > cost-effective" is that it would forego some quality control that the > traditional system ensured, such as copyediting. I see no emphasis > anywhere in the literature on repositories that copyediting is a > function that needs to be preserved in that infrastructure. Green OA > is, in this respect, a less than optimal approach to disseminating > knowledge, and it is unfair to claim that a repository-based > infrastructure is more cost-effective when it is so only in part > because it is content to offer a lower level of service. > > Sandy Thatcher