From: Viral Amin <[log in to unmask]> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:38:38 -0500 Susan, Thanks for your guidance in this and referring me to the Digital Dictionary of the DLF. I'm of a mind with you that an in-house policy should be drawn up that includes guidelines on license data, and that coordinates the various aspects of our e-Resources operation. Sincerely, Viral On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:13 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > From: Susan Raidy-Klein <[log in to unmask]> > Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:45:30 -0500 > > Viral, > > You're right to be planning how to align the semantics of your ERM and > its counterpart in license agreements; also plan to match ERM codes > with system codes in acquisitions and access services. This is more > art than science, but if you haven't already consulted the Digital > Dictionary of the Digital Library (DLF), it's a good starting place. > > Susan Raidy-Klein > Collection Development & Acquisition Librarian > University of Massachusetts Dartmouth > N. Dartmouth, MA 02747 > [log in to unmask] > > > ________________________________ > From: Viral Amin <[log in to unmask]> > Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 14:38:05 -0500 > > Nathan, > > Thanks for clarifying. The license states explicitly that digital > transmission for ILL is granted to Licensee, under the condition I > noted. However, I want the metadata in our ERM (360 Resource Manager) > to capture these terms. I found a "restrictions on use for staff" > note field, which somebody in response to my email suggested, and > which is defined in general terms by the 360 Glossary. > > Another issue of concern to me, then, is how strictly to follow the > semantics of ERM metadata fields for license terms. Any advice on > this would be helpful too. > > Viral > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:26 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > From: "Hosburgh, Nathan" <[log in to unmask]> > > Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:08:36 -0700 > > > > Viral, > > > > I've worked in both ILL and Electronic Resources Management, so I have > > a fair bit of experience interpreting licenses. > > > > Based on what you've quoted from the license, I don't see anything > > specifically prohibiting electronic transmission of content from your > > end. So, I would note "permitted" for both ILL Secure Electronic & > > ILL Electronic (email). These fields refer to any restrictions placed > > on you as the lending library - restrictions that do not appear to be > > in the license. If such restrictions were present, the license would > > say something like "the electronic content must be printed as a paper > > copy before supplying via ILL, whether by post, facsimile, or digital > > transmission..." > > > > If you want to ensure that your library is following the stipulation > > that, "a note must be sent to the borrowing library instructing it to > > delete the electronic copy and to provide the library patron with a > > paper copy", you would need to create such a notice and place it > > either on the document itself, in the body of the email to which the > > document is attached, or on a cover page preceding the document. > > > > This is what I recommend based on my experience, but you could always > > contact the publisher to clarify. > > > > Nate > > > > Nathan Hosburgh > > Electronic Resources Librarian > > Assistant Professor > > Montana State University Library > > P.O. Box 173320 > > Bozeman, MT 59717-3320 > > [log in to unmask]