From: Sally Morris <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:21:56 +0000

No, the article itself appears adequately edited - it's just the abstract
which seems to have escaped the editors' attention (the same may be true of
the article which originally sparked this discussion)

They do repeat some text word for word from their own previous article,
though...

Sally Morris
South House, The Street, Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex, UK  BN13 3UU
Email:  [log in to unmask]

-----Original Message-----
From: Pippa Smart <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:37:39 +0000

Is this a joke article?

Pippa

*****
Pippa Smart
Research Communication and Publishing Consultant PSP Consulting
email: [log in to unmask]
Web: www.pspconsulting.org
Editor of the ALPSP-Alert, Reviews editor of Learned Publishing
****


On 18 February 2013 20:52, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: Richard Poynder <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:15:45 +0100
>
> Joe,
>
> You might want to read the abstract to this paper:
>
> http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.000
> 3455
>
> Richard Poynder