From: Sally Morris <[log in to unmask]> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:21:56 +0000 No, the article itself appears adequately edited - it's just the abstract which seems to have escaped the editors' attention (the same may be true of the article which originally sparked this discussion) They do repeat some text word for word from their own previous article, though... Sally Morris South House, The Street, Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex, UK BN13 3UU Email: [log in to unmask] -----Original Message----- From: Pippa Smart <[log in to unmask]> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:37:39 +0000 Is this a joke article? Pippa ***** Pippa Smart Research Communication and Publishing Consultant PSP Consulting email: [log in to unmask] Web: www.pspconsulting.org Editor of the ALPSP-Alert, Reviews editor of Learned Publishing **** On 18 February 2013 20:52, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > From: Richard Poynder <[log in to unmask]> > Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:15:45 +0100 > > Joe, > > You might want to read the abstract to this paper: > > http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.000 > 3455 > > Richard Poynder