From: Elena Giglia <[log in to unmask]> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:56:00 +0100 I think peer review goes far over copyediting. What about a perfectly written work with fabricated data? Let's have a look to Retraction Watch to see how deep and diffuse is scientific misconduct: http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/ This is what peer review should be about, and this is actually the "decline" Elena dott.ssa Elena Giglia Responsabile Progetti Open Access Università degli Studi di Torino +39.011.6705923 skype: egiglia Pubblicazioni e presentazioni in Open Access su E-LIS: http://tinyurl.com/6gbgaj2