From: Viral Amin <[log in to unmask]> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:22:39 -0400 Thanks for making that clear. To confirm the trickiness of the matter, I learned from Oxford that this is an issue of contract interpretation, and it should be brought before legal counsel. Viral Amin Metadata/Electronic Resources Librarian Library & Learning Services Marymount University [log in to unmask] On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:50 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > From: Darlene McCoy <[log in to unmask]> > Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 21:13:13 +0000 > > Termination is one provision and a cure period is another provision. > If there is a cure period and the cure is not completed in 30 days, > the parties will get another 30 days for termination. Language is > very tricky, so drafting can modify this assumption. > > Darlene Evans McCoy > Director of Digital Initiatives > OhioLINK > OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS > Columbus, Ohio 43215 > [log in to unmask] > > -----Original Message----- > From: Viral Amin <[log in to unmask]> > Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:11:49 -0400 > > Hello, > > I'm new to this, so I'm eager to test my assumptions. > > In the license I'm currently reading through, a period of 30 days is > granted to a Licensee or Licensor to cure a breach of contract. > However, I am only a bit more hesitant to construe the cure period as > the termination period, even if the condition for termination is > either this breach, or if it is a cessation of all or part of the > Licensed Works, in case of which a 30 notice must be given. Would > anyone safely assume, given these conditions for termination, that the > termination period for both Licensee and Licensor is 30 days? > > -- > Viral Amin > Metadata/Electronic Resources Librarian > Library & Learning Services > Marymount University > [log in to unmask]