From: Heather Morrison <[log in to unmask]> Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 11:30:46 -0700 Since releasing the March 31, 2013 (not 3013) Dramatic Growth of Open Access yesterday at midnight, I've received two responses requiring substantive corrections and clarifications and one noting typos. All the changes have been made. Can this now be considered a peer-reviewed blogpost? Should I put a copy in the file for the tenure & promotion committee? Here is the blogpost in question - further review welcome: http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.ca/2013/04/dramatic-growth-of-open-access-3013.html best, Dr. Heather Morrison Freedom for scholarship in the internet age http://summit.sfu.ca/item/12537