From: "Hosburgh, Nathan" <[log in to unmask]> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 15:43:35 -0600 Pagination is only one way in which a Green OA article may differ from its version of record. Other examples: - incomplete/missing references - missing charts/figures - missing/revised content b/n versions due to peer review & editing - etc. I'm not saying this is the case with all/most Green OA articles, but there is certainly the potential for these discrepancies. So, I think Sandy is right that some faculty/scholars/researchers will not be content with a Green OA version. Green OA relies to some extent on the depositors (whether researchers or repository admins) to ensure that the archival version is useful. Nathan Hosburgh Electronic Resources Librarian Assistant Professor Montana State University Library -----Original Message----- From: Ari Belenkiy <[log in to unmask]> Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 23:36:19 -0700 The question addresses only one nuance - how to cite a correct page for reference. But the answer is simple. When we site an article, its first and last page suffice. No one cites the intermediate pages in the article (as it is usually done in the book). Sometimes an equation is quoted by its number and not by the page it is on. So if the first and last pages are available it is enough for all purposes. Ari Belenkiy On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 9:10 AM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > From: Sandy Thatcher <[log in to unmask]> > Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 14:27:48 -0500 > > I'm interested in how Rick would answer the following question: given > that Green OA articles are usually not the version of record, are you > content to cancel subscriptions knowing that scrupulous faculty > members will need to consult the version of record in quoting from an > article and that, therefore, you would not be supplying everything > that such faculty members need? I am referring here, of course, to > journals "closer to the center of our interests," not to ones "near > the periphery." I'm perfectly willing to grant that Green OA content > may suffice to fulfill the needs of classroom teaching where it may > not matter so much if a student does not get a quotation exactly > right, but scholars should not be willing to settle for second best in > doing their formal writing for publication. > > Sandy Thatcher