I know CUP have a lawyer in house but I suspect that they use external expert lawyers for advice on developments. Lawyers are paid to think of any problems that might occur. They are inventive and can reasonably think of new problems/dangers which might arrive as the legislative framework changes Anthomy |
| From: Jim O'Donnell <[log in to unmask]> Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 14:58:20 -0500 From a new scholarly book (2011) from Cambridge University Press, at the foot of the copyright page: "Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate." (1) Do they imply they *do* guarantee persistence and accuracy of their own websites that may be referenced? (2) Does this not belabor the obvious? Where in the Press hierarchy did this idea come from and to whom did it seem a good idea? Jim O'Donnell Georgetown U. |