From: Richard James <[log in to unmask]> Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 11:42:36 -0400 MERLOT II (http://info.merlot.org/merlothelp/index.htm#merlot_collection.htm) lists OER of various media types that have been subject to its open peer-review process. The quality of their resources seems uniformly high, so you could do worse than select from what they have available. On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 7:04 AM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > From: Charlotte Roh <[log in to unmask]> > Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:29:50 -0400 > > Hm, this is interesting question. I know there are videos on how to evaluate > websites or Wikipedia, but I don't know about OERs. This might be because > there are so many different types of multimedia. > > We don't include evaluation on our libguide > (http://guides.library.umass.edu/oer) but when I mention that certain > resources are peer-reviewed, faculty definitely appreciate it. > > If you get any responses off list, I'd be interested to hear them! > > Best, > Charlotte > > > Charlotte Roh > Scholarly Communications Resident Librarian > W.E.B. Du Bois Library > University of Massachusetts > Amherst, MA 01003 > Email: [log in to unmask] > > -----Original Message----- > > From: "TAYLOR, TUCKER" <[log in to unmask]> > Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:28:54 +0000 > > Hi all- > > I'm working on a libguide about open educational resources, mainly focused > on materials used in teaching. I wanted to include a page > about how to evaluate open educational resources. Can anyone point > me to some good sources? I'm particularly interested in short video, but > would be happy for any information that could be useful for my faculty and > students to use to evaluate this information. > > Thanks very much- > > Tucky > > Tucker Taylor > Head, Circulation Department > Thomas Cooper Library > University of South Carolina > Columbia, SC 29208 > [log in to unmask]