From: Jim O'Donnell <[log in to unmask]> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 16:03:37 -0400 From a librarian I don't know otherwise. Jim O'Donnell ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:44 PM Subject: RE: A questionable publishing model To: [log in to unmask] Dear Professor O'Donnell, This year I've received at least one query a month regarding Lambert and VDM subsidiaries. We advise graduate students to think carefully about whether publishing with Lambert would benefit their career, and its reputation in their subject field. What we don't say outright is that we consider Lambert a predatory publisher. In my personal opinion, a vanity press would be better, because at least they would let the author keep the copyright. Publishing with Lambert prevents an academic from publishing that work in a more reputable venue. Best, -----Original Message----- From: Jim O'Donnell <[log in to unmask]> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:11:09 -0400 Seen today: http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2014/03/lap_lambert_academic_publishing_my_trip_to_a_print_content_farm.single.html This is a not-quite-vanity press -- they will in fact "publish" your book without asking you for money; then they will ask you for money, encouraging you to buy an appreciable number of copies of your book. The book may be virtually any master's or even baccalaureate thesis they can find evidence of on the web anywhere. By this model they "publish" tens of thousands of books. What's interesting is that there's clearly a need being met and clearly a business model at work here. Few serious readers of this piece will make excuses for the model, but the company will continue to find those tens of thousands of authors, who will find value in even this sketchiest of deals. Jim O'Donnell Georgetown