From: Rick Anderson <[log in to unmask]> Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 13:17:13 +0000 One sentence in COAR’s Statement Against Elsevier’s Sharing Policy ( ) stands out to me in particular: “Any delay in the open availability of research articles curtails scientific progress and places unnecessary constraints on delivering the benefits of research back to the public.” This is quite a remarkable statement — what’s it saying is that any access model that involves anything less than a) immediate and universal free access under b) any terms other than CC BY is unacceptable. In practice, this would seem to be a call for the abolishment of toll access entirely. If so, that’s fine, but it seems like we shouldn’t be coy about it — can anyone from COAR clarify whether this was the intent of the language in question? And if not, then was this language included by accident? --- Rick Anderson Assoc. Dean for Scholarly Resources & Collections Marriott Library, University of Utah [log in to unmask]