From: David Prosser <[log in to unmask]> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 08:35:41 +0000 2. If so, it appears to me that Elsevier’s new sharing policy actually represents a net increase in liberality when it comes to sharing and posting ― am I mistaken about that? Rick, previously authors who were not subject to deposit mandates could deposit their papers without embargo. Now they can’t. I think that is a significant decrease in liberality and outweighs the increases (which in some areas was just Elsevier catching-up with existing practice) David On 22 Jun 2015, at 23:53, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > From: Rick Anderson <[log in to unmask]> > Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:40:49 +0000 > > I would still be very interested in answers to my two questions below, > particularly from those who have been most critical of Elsevier’s new > policy. > > 1. As far as anyone on this list can tell, does the matrix at > http://www.slideshare.net/aliciawise/whats-changed-in-sharing-policy fully > and accurately represent what has changed with the new policy? > > 2. If so, it appears to me that Elsevier’s new sharing policy actually > represents a net increase in liberality when it comes to sharing and > posting ― am I mistaken about that? > > --- > Rick Anderson > Assoc. Dean for Scholarly Resources & Collections > Marriott Library, University of Utah > [log in to unmask]