From: David Prosser <[log in to unmask]> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 07:10:59 +0000 Perhaps Matt could expand on why some publishers and some publisher associations (including STM) have lobbied hard against TDM exceptions being implemented in national and international copyright regimes? David On 27 Jul 2016, at 02:26, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote: From: Matt McKay <[log in to unmask]> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 15:02:06 +0000 Scientific publishers support text and data mining by providing access to quality content and working with researchers to overcome technical challenges. This also includes simplified licensing and the support for text formatting allowing for efficient TDM activities. Active users indicate that enabling initiatives introduced by publishers deliver not only the legal certainty that they look for, but also meet their practical needs. Most major STM publishers do and will continue to offer licenses/license clauses which enable their customers to mine both text and data across the research, corporate and educational sectors. Likewise, most major STM publishers already meet the need of users for TDM through various channels such as those facilitated by CrossRef with a single one-time click through across multiple publisher platforms. You can read STM’s position in our TDM Declaration issued last year: http://www.stm-assoc.org/2015_11_10_Text_and_Data_Mining_Declaration.pdf