From: Adam Siegel <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 18:00:58 +0000

I wouldn't say Pallante was "correct."  She submitted her views for the
record here: http://copyright.gov/laws/testimonies/022615-testimony-
pallante.pdf.

Adam

Adam Siegel
Bibliographer for Languages, Literatures, and Performing Arts
Agricultural and Resource Economics Librarian
University of California, Davis
Davis  CA  95616
http://people.lib.ucdavis.edu/~apsiegel/


________________________________________
From: Joseph Esposito <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 21:51:21 -0400

It's good that the temperature on this debate is dropping, but I don't
see the underlying issue being engaged: Isn't Pallante correct that
the Copyright Office belongs elsewhere, preferably in the Department
of Commerce? It sounds like Hayden is protecting her turf, as most
people would want to do, but the substantive issue here is still not
being addressed.

Joe Esposito

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:42 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> From: "Jim O'Donnell" <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 20:31:12 -0400
>
> Here's a fresh posting that outlines a sensible interpretation of the
> developments at LC.
>
> https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20161031/16531435930/
conspiracy-theories-run-amock-over-copyright-office-executive-changes.shtml