From: "Williams, Ginger" <[log in to unmask]> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 01:01:55 +0000 I don't know that publishers care much, although that may be changing as government agencies begin requiring that research they fund be made available to public at no charge after a limited embargo period. Many finders require that the funding source be acknowledged. Acknowledging funders is also good ethical practice, as funders may have interests that can unconsciously bias research directions and interpretations. For example, research on tobacco use funded by tobacco companies is likely to be carefully scrutinized due to potential for bias. > On Feb 19, 2017, at 6:25 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > From: Rehana Raza <[log in to unmask]> > Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 21:51:45 +0500 > > Can anyone explain, how important it is for publishers to collect > funding details from authors? > > Rehanna > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Jim O'Donnell" <[log in to unmask]> > Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:32:56 -0700 > > With thanks to colleagues who pointed out that Web of Science can > answer my question, here's a snapshot: > > Gates Foundation > > Limited to years 2015-2016, and Document type: articles > > Results: 3,954 > > 2016 (1,956) > 2015 (1,907) > > > National Institutes of Health > > Limited to years 2015-2016, and Document type: articles > > Results: 133,038 > > 2015 (67,013) > 2016 (63,144) > > > National Science Foundation > > Limited to years 2015-2016, and Document type: articles > > Results: 155,485 > > 2015 (76,349) > 2016 (74,863) > > > Jim O'Donnell > Arizona State University