From: "Bachman, Trisha" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:05:56 +0000

Great discussion.

To some extent, we rely on databases like CIAO and Policy File to bring our
team and our users to these types of reports (it looks like both contain
publications from Chatham House and Oxfam, though there may be a lag in
CIAO for the newer works).  PAIS Index seems to be even more behind when it
comes to Chatham House and Oxfam (I don't know enough about this particular
product to hazard a guess as to why that is). We previously had good
success linking to these reports via the MERLN website for our military and
interagency users, but that effort lacked in things like metadata, tagging,
and eventually staffing, so it's also experiencing a lag in updating.  This
might be something to bring up to ITHAKA in the future?  Some of the
Chatham House materials are already in JSTOR (mostly the journal articles
it looks like), so this may be a good fit?

In either event, I'm really interested in the discussion on crowd-funding
and the work being done by Ingenta.  Thanks for a stimulating conversation!

Trish
NDU Libraries


-----Original Message-----
From: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:54:38 +0000

Of course, this is just the tip of an iceberg.

A couple of weeks ago I was chatting to the Head of Communications at
Chatham House, another UK-based NGO. He was telling me that they publish a
fair number of reports a year, but simply post them on their website. He
was totally puzzled when I wondered how they would be discovered in
academic institutions; he had no idea that reaching students and academics
might require doing more than simply relying on Google and posting free
PDFs on their website. When I mentioned things like persistent identifiers,
long-term archiving, and citation tools, I might as well have been speaking
Martian - he had no idea what I was going on about. So, yes, NGO
publications do, I think, have limited reach and are an under-discovered
and an under-valued resource - amazing when one considers how cheap they
are!

So, what to do? It costs money to capture content and wrap it with the
metadata needed to insert it into both mainstream and specialist discovery
channels, to ensure it is available in a persistent and reliable manner. A
challenge when NGOs have little or no funds for marketing. A challenge for
any aggregator who would struggle to earn a return on their investment
since they would be competing against free versions hosted on the parent
website - assuming of course, they got permission from the copyright owner
to aggregate the content in the first place.

But what if, like with arXiv, librarians 'crowd-funded' an effort that
would harvest this content from willing NGOs, large and small, do the
necessary to enrich it with industry-standard metadata (DOIs and the like),
and then feed the relevant discovery and delivery channels.
Larger NGOs like Oxfam can hire professionals like Emily to direct their
publishing programmes, but I bet smaller ones, like Chatham House, lack
in-house publishing expertise. Maybe the 'crowd-funded'
effort could also fund best-practice advice and training to improve NGOs'
ability to publish in a manner that is in tune with the demands of the
industry (like XML).

Would anyone be interested in exploring this idea?

Toby

(And due thanks to Ann Okerson for her advice in preparing this reply).

Toby Green
Public Affairs and Communications Directorate OECD Winner The Academic and
Professional Publisher Award 2017