From: UTP Journals <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:15 PM

*now available online*



*Journal of Scholarly Publishing*

*Vol. 49, No. 1, October 2017*

*JSP Online: http://bit.ly/jsp491 <http://bit.ly/jsp491>*

*Special Issue on Open Access*

Marguerite Avery
<http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Avery%2C+Marguerite>, Alex
Holzman <http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Holzman%2C+Alex>, Robert Brown
<http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Brown%2C+Robert>

The co-editors of the *Journal of Scholarly Publishing* introduce the
second special issue of their tenure. This issue on open access publishing
was undertaken with the assistance of guest co-editor Marguerite Avery.
http://bit.ly/jsp491a



*Traditional versus Open Access Scholarly Journal Publishing: An Economic
Perspective*

Julia Frankland
<http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Frankland%2C+Julia>, Margaret
A. Ray <http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Ray%2C+Margaret+A>

The debate surrounding open access journal publishing is part of a broader
debate related to the electronic dissemination of information. Compared to
print journals, electronic journals have lower publishing costs and allow
for expanded access to scholarly research. However, open access publishing
introduces an added cost of evaluating an ever-increasing number of
published sources and the potential for misinformation. This paper analyses
the traditional and open access scholarly publishing models from an
economic perspective. Analysing the alternative market structures of these
models can help to identify strategies to maximize net benefits in the
scholarly publishing market. http://bit.ly/jsp491b





*Open Publication, Digital Abundance, and Scarce Labour*

Martin Paul Eve

This article examines the challenges of labour provision in the open-access
online scholarly publishing environment. While the technological
underpinnings of open access imply an abundance, it is also the case that
the labour that remains necessary in publishing processes is based on a set
of economics that are scarce: the availability of human time, effort, and
expertise. I here argue, with a demonstration of some of the labours of XML
typesetting, that we are unlikely to realize the transformations of an
abundant proliferation of scholarship without a substantial change and
redistribution of labour functions to authors, which is unlikely to be
socially accepted. The resultant outputs from this process would also, I
argue, be less likely to be machine readable and semantically rich, thereby
conflicting with other imagined digital possibilities. http://bit.ly/jsp491c





*Opening the Monograph: Lessons from Luminos*

Alison Mudditt



In response to increasing challenges to both the financial model and the
distribution model for traditional monographs, the University of California
Press developed and launched a new open access monograph program, Luminos,
in 2015. Now that Luminos is halfway through its second year, this article
reviews the program's progress in addressing its three core goals:
developing a more sustainable financial model, improving access and impact,
and providing a digital space with multimedia capabilities for monographs.
http://bit.ly/jsp491d





*The Open Textbook Toolkit: Seeding Successful Partnerships for
Collaboration between Academic Libraries and University Presses*

Mira Waller <http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Waller%2C+Mira>, William
M. Cross <http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Cross%2C+William+M>, Lillian
Rigling <http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Rigling%2C+Lillian>

Libraries and university presses coexist in a complex and increasingly
consolidated scholarly communication ecosystem. Each brings different
strengths, values, and viewpoints that can inform and enrich a joint
project. In this paper we discuss potential barriers to and benefits of
collaboration between academic libraries and university presses and
introduce a case study of such a collaboration: the Open Textbook Toolkit.
This project, funded by a grant from the Institute of Museum and Library
Services, is currently investigating the components needed to support
faculty in one discipline, psychology, who are considering adopting open
educational resources. By leveraging both library and press expertise, the
Toolkit represents one model for fruitful collaboration.
http://bit.ly/jsp491e





*Evaluating and Promoting Open Data Practices in Open Access Journals*

Eleni Castro <http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Castro%2C+Eleni>, Mercè
Crosas <http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Crosas%2C+Merc%C3%A8>, Alex
Garnett <http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Garnett%2C+Alex>, Kasey
Sheridan <http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Sheridan%2C+Kasey>, Micah
Altman <http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Altman%2C+Micah>

The last decade has seen a dramatic increase in attention from the
scholarly communications and research community to open access (OA) and
open data practices. These are potentially related because journal
publication policies and practices both signal disciplinary norms and
provide direct incentives for data sharing and citation. However, there is
little research evaluating the data policies of OA journals. In this study
we analyse the state of data policies for OA journals by employing random
sampling of the Directory of Open Access Journals and Open Journal Systems
journal directories and applying a coding framework that integrates both
previous studies and emerging taxonomies of data sharing and citation. This
study, for the first time, reveals both the low prevalence of data-sharing
policies and practices in OA journals, which differs from the previous
studies of commercial journals in specific disciplines.

http://bit.ly/jsp491f





*Gold Open Access Publishing in Mega-Journals: Developing Countries Pay the
Price of Western Premium Academic Output*

Jacintha Ellers
<http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Ellers%2C+Jacintha>, Thomas
W. Crowther <http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Crowther%2C+Thomas+W>, Jeffrey
A. Harvey <http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Harvey%2C+Jeffrey+A>

Open access publishing (OAP) makes research output freely available, and
several national governments have now made OAP mandatory for all publicly
funded research. Gold OAP is a common form of OAP where the author pays an
article processing charge (APC) to make the article freely available to
readers. However, gold OAP is a cause for concern because it drives a
redistribution of valuable research money to support open access papers in
‘mega-journals’ with more permissive acceptance criteria. We present a
data-driven evaluation of the financial ramifications of gold OAP and
provide evidence that gold OAP in mega-journals is biased toward Western
industrialized countries. From 2011 to 2015, the period of our data
collection, countries with developing economies had a disproportionately
greater share of articles published in the lower-tier mega-journals and
thus paid article APCs that cross-subsidize publications in the top-tier
journals of the same publisher. Conversely, scientists from Western
developed countries had a disproportionately greater share of articles
published in those same top-tier journals. The global inequity of the
cross-subsidizing APC model was demonstrated across five different
mega-journals, showing that the issue is a common problem. We need to
develop stringent and fair criteria that address the global financial
implications of OAP, as publication fees should reflect the real cost of
publishing and be transparent for authors. http://bit.ly/jsp491g





*Adoption of Open Access Publishing by Academic Researchers in Kenya*

Wanyenda Chilimo
<http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Chilimo%2C+Wanyenda>, Aggrey
Adem <http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Adem%2C+Aggrey>, Ajwang' Nicholas
Walter Otieno
<http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Otieno%2C+Ajwang%27+Nicholas+Walter>, Mary
Maina <http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Maina%2C+Mary>



This study investigates Kenyan scholars' adoption of open access (OA). The
authors used a questionnaire to collect data from academic researchers at
selected Kenyan public universities. The findings of this study indicate
that while Kenyan researchers have embraced the concept of OA, challenges
such as a lack of mechanisms to guide academic researchers on where to
publish, a dearth of funding mechanisms to cover article processing
charges, and a lack of accreditation mechanisms for regional and national
journals are exposing Kenyan academic researchers to unscrupulous journal
publishers and predatory publishing outlets. OA advocates in Kenyan
universities need to devise innovative ways of raising awareness about OA,
and these universities should provide the environment, infrastructure, and
capacity building needed to support OA. http://bit.ly/jsp491h





*Assessing the Openness of Anthropology Journals*

Melody Dale <http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Dale%2C+Melody>, Nickoal
Eichmann-Kalwara
<http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Eichmann-Kalwara%2C+Nickoal>, Sheeji
Kathuria <http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Kathuria%2C+Sheeji>, Mary Ann
Jones <http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Jones%2C+Mary+Ann>

This study analyses the extent of gold open access (OA) publishing options
in 377 anthropology journals by applying a six-level coding scheme
(0=non-transparent publishing, 5=fully OA, i.e., free to read and publish
without embargo). This analysis is meant to simplify the process of
identifying OA journal publishing options in the discipline of
anthropology, in addition to sharing findings on some of the prominent
issues in OA publishing as they relate to anthropology journals, including
non-transparency among publishers and the prevalence and price of article
processing charges (APCs). We conclude that publishers should be more
transparent about their OA publishing options and policies by providing
conspicuous and straightforward information to potential authors. Further,
we find that in the anthropology scholarly communication ecosystem, APCs
for hybrid journals are more expensive than those for fully gold OA
journals, thus contradicting the assumption that gold OA is more costly to
researchers.  *http://bit.ly/jsp491i* <http://bit.ly/jsp491i>





*Reviews*



*The Chicago Guide to Fact-Checking** by Brooke Borel*

Steven E. Gump <http://www.utpjournals.press/author/Gump%2C+Steven+E> Brooke
Borel <http://www.utpjournals.press/author/>

http://bit.ly/jsp491j



A must for anyone who crosses the scholarly publishing path—authors,
editors, marketers, and publishers of books and journals. *JSP* is the
indispensable resource for academics and publishers that addresses the new
challenges resulting from changes in technology, funding, and innovations
in publishing. *JSP* is available in print and online.



For more information about the *Journal of Scholarly Publishing* or for
submissions information, please contact:



University of Toronto Press - Journals Division

5201 Dufferin St., Toronto, ON, Canada M3H 5T8
<https://maps.google.com/?q=5201+Dufferin+St.,+Toronto,+ON,+Canada+M3H+5T8&entry=gmail&source=g>

Tel: (416) 667-7810 Fax: (416) 667-7881

Fax Toll Free in North America 1-800-221-9985 <(800)%20221-9985>

[log in to unmask]

*http://utpjournals.press/loi/jsp <http://utpjournals.press/loi/jsp>*