From: "Bernd-Christoph Kämper (UB)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 14:00:16 +0200

Dear Toby and Liblicense-L readers,

that is correct, but the situation in Sweden is a bit different from Germany.

In Sweden, the previous contract has been renewed monthwise during the negotiations, for details cf.
http://openaccess.blogg.kb.se/bibsamkonsortiet/qa-about-the-cancellation-of-the-agreement-with-elsevier-commencing-1-july/

In Germany, the German Rector's conference had already established an emergency plan to secure the supply of universities with needed articles on Dec 1, 2016. There were about 60 institutions whose (multi-year) contract (either direct, or through regional/other consortia) expired by the end of 2016; for a brief period, they lost access, but in mid February 2017 Elsevier re-instated access for those institutions unilaterally (cf. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/continued-elsevier-access-in-support-of-german-science, https://www.nature.com/news/german-scientists-regain-access-to-elsevier-journals-1.21482). During 2017 further institutions, science organisations and regional consortia announced that they would not renew their Elsevier contracts and by the end of 2017 the contracts of 200 Institutions (including the 60 mentioned above) had expired. Access for all those institutions continued (without payment) until July 11 when access was finally cut off after DEAL had declared the break-down of and suspension of the negotiations with the publisher (for details cf. https://www.projekt-deal.de/, https://www.projekt-deal.de/informationen/, https://www.projekt-deal.de/press-review/).

So Institutions in Germany have lost now access to content published since January 2017 or since January 2016, depending on the expiry date of their previous contracts.
Also, they have lost access to all previous published content behind paywalls that is not covered by previous agreements. This differs from institution to institution.

In Baden-Württemberg, for example, our regional consortium for 2015-2017 had access to over 2000 Elsevier Journals, but perpetual access rights 2015-2017 have been negotiated only for a subset (archival collection) of about 1100 titles.

There also remain access rights to our local core collections (locally subscribed titles) until 2014. Also, DFG has funded a national license for Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907-2002 which however does not cover all existing backfile collections (cf. https://www.nationallizenzen.de/angebote/nlproduct.2006-03-10.4713615682). There is also a lot of Elsevier content that is not behind paywalls, e.g. for the Cell Press titles, access becomes free 12 months after publication, and all articles published open access (hybrid or gold).

Counter Usage Statistics for July and August 2018 are not yet available, so it is too early to give an account of the actual effect that the cutoff had on our usage.

However, in the first 14 days after Elsevier cut off access to our university, the announced free (and fast) interlibrary loan service for Elsevier Articles offered to members of the university (staff and students), cf. https://www.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/suchen-bestellen/e-ressourcen/deal.html, was taken up by just 11 persons for just 18 articles. For comparison, from Nov 2016 to Nov 2017 (12 months; Dec 2017 was an outlier) we had 535000 fulltext downloads, of which 86.000 were articles from the current publication year (2017, pre-published 2018, and articles in press), turnaways were 20.000.

Boingboing https://boingboing.net/2016/12/15/germany-wide-consortium-of-res.html wrote
"Even so, this kind of boycott was unimaginable until recently -- but the rise of guerrilla open access sites like Sci-Hub mean that researchers at participating institutions can continue to access Elsevier papers by other means." And someone on twitter summarized this as "60 german libraries announce #Elsevier boycott. Participants will access papers via pirate libs, like @Sci_Hub WoW!" 

Apparently, libraries in Germany enjoy a very revolutionary image ;-) Now, as highlighted above, we do offer free *and* legal alternatives to access Elsevier articles, but they seem less popular. Perhaps our users mistake Sci-hub as short for "Sciencedirect-Hub" and think it's an Elsevier sponsored service? There is however a range of other perfectly legal routes for students and academics to quickly get hold of needed articles, as outlined for example by Björn Brembs in a widely circulated post, "So your institute went cold turkey on publisher X. What now?" (http://bjoern.brembs.net/2016/12/so-your-institute-went-cold-turkey-on-publisher-x-what-now/).

So we do not expect that faculty will start rioting, at least not against us (although I'd like to see a riot against Elsevier ;-). To the contrary, 16 years ago, at one of those cyclically recurring budget crises, our university library's faculty advisory board unanimously decided to back our proposal for a politically motivated "emergency decision" to cancel all of our Elsevier subscriptions (http://liblicense.crl.edu/ListArchives/0205/msg00127.html), an Elsevier Boycott that lasted 2 years, triggered a restructuring of our collection development in general (also for other publishers) and ultimately led to a new deal for Stuttgart University on a much lower and more sustainable pricing level. This time, it's again a political decision, widely backed by faculty, to support the demand of the German Rector's Conference for a sustainable publish and read model, which means fair payment for publication and unrestricted availability for readers afterwards. Also, many prominent scientists that were on the editorial and advisory boards of Elsevier have resigned in order to protest against the inacceptable demands of Elsevier and to support the DEAL negotiations, cf. https://idw-online.de/de/news682623

Bernd-Christoph Kaemper, Stuttgart University Library

Am 09.08.2018 um 23:28 schrieb LIBLICENSE:
From: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 09:12:54 +0000

What the article fails to mention is that researchers still retain access to all content published prior to the ending of the previous deals (so, in the case of Bibsam, prior to July 1). So, only very recent articles are not available.

Toby Green
Public Affairs and Communications Directorate
OECD


On 9 Aug 2018, at 04:26, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

From: Colin Steele <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 00:37:57 +0000

Interesting to see if this European initiative, just documented in the Times Higher Education, flows on to other countries. Best Colin

Times Higher Education

German and Swedish libraries shrug off Elsevier shutdown

No sign of breakthrough as boycott yet to have significant impact on publisher

August 8, 2018

·        Share on twitter

High price: in Germany, talks over a new national contract with Elsevier broke down because of concerns over rising costs

Losing access to new content from the world’s biggest academic publisher might sound like a nightmare for university libraries.

But, a month after being cut off from new Elsevier articles, librarians in Sweden have reported only a handful of complaints, while in Germany, institutions said that they have had to deal with relatively few requests for blocked papers.

<image001.jpg>

Talks collapse as Germany rejects ‘unacceptable’ Elsevier offer

The two countries are being watched closely by librarians in other countries to see how feasible it is to ditch big publishers, either permanently or as part of a contract-negotiating strategy, as they push for periodicals to move towards an open access model. It is one of the first big tests of university resilience in the face of no access – Elsevier had previously stopped short of cutting off Germany.

In Sweden, libraries have been without access to content published since 30 June after the country’s university negotiating consortium decided in May to end its contract with Elsevier because of rising costs and what it saw as an insufficient offer on open access.

In Germany, meanwhile, talks over a new national contract that had dragged on unsuccessfully for more than a year and a half broke down last month over similar issues, and libraries have been without access to new material since 10 July.

Demand for articles is relatively low during the summer holidays, while librarians arguably have an incentive to downplay any problems to strengthen their negotiating hand, and pressure on libraries could grow as an ever greater proportion of Elsevier material becomes unavailable.

But so far, Swedish librarians surveyed by Times Higher Education have reported a handful of complaints, at most.

Up until now, three researchers have made complaints [that I am aware of],” said Jakob Harnesk, library director at Karlstad University. “Researchers that express support for the cancellation by far outnumber the negative ones.”

One library head, who preferred to remain anonymous, said that they had received one call from a researcher concerned about not being able to access new issues of a specific journal. “The rest of the very few comments we have got have been supportive,” they said.

Swedish libraries are able to get around the blockage through inter-library loans – borrowing papers from libraries that still have access, for example those abroad. “So long as inter-library loan is an option, I see no problem,” said David Lawrence, director of Linköping University library.

Wilhelm Widmark, director of Stockholm University library, said that he had not yet received many requests for loans, and suspected instead that scholars were sharing articles. “We haven't had any complaints yet,” he said. “We have only received some feedback from researchers who support our cancellation.”


In Germany, Bernhard Mittermaier, a member of the negotiating team for Project Deal, the country’s national negotiating consortium, said that, judging by a recent internal survey of about 30 institutions, there are on the whole “no complaints and no reactions” to the lack of content.

In the weeks since new content has been unavailable, German institutions on average have had to request 20 papers on loan from other libraries, he said. “That’s no problem at all,” he said. “This can be done by the director of the library in the evening, from the sofa”.

Each loan costs €6 (£5.34), he said – an expense dwarfed by the savings that libraries were making by not subscribing to Elsevier journals. Depending on their size, some libraries had been paying up to €800,000 a year for Elsevier content, he said; they now therefore had a lot more money in their budgets and some were now investing this saving into open access publishing instead.

But, if Germany and Sweden are not under any immediate pressure to seek a deal, neither seemingly is Elsevier. The share price of its parent company, RELX, rose during July, and in the last week of the month it posted results for the first half of 2018 that reassured analysts that the dispute in Germany and Sweden had not slowed revenue growth. Until it cut off access in July, the publisher had in effect been providing free access to more than 200 German institutions since the beginning of 2018.

The German strategy is still to wait for the pressure to build on Elsevier and ultimately strike a new deal with them, rather than make the current state of affairs permanent, said Dr Mittermaier. He did acknowledge that there was a “risk” that some libraries, happy with the savings that they were currently making, would decide not to join any new national deal.

But German researchers were stepping up pressure in other ways, by declining to submit articles, conduct peer review and stepping down from the editorial boards of journals, he added.

An Elsevier spokeswoman said: “Trends in access requests show nothing unusual in Germany and Sweden. Trends in paper submissions are not discernible after such a short period of time.

“We remain open to constructive talks to find a sustainable national solution in both Germany and Sweden.”


---------------------------------------------

Colin Steele
Emeritus Fellow

ANU College of Arts and Social Sciences

The Australian National University

Room 3.31, Beryl Rawson Building #13

Acton, ACT, 2601
Australia

 

P: + 61 2 6125 8983

E: [log in to unmask]