I have no idea whether the claim that Sci-Hub makes about how it manages to access journals in libraries is accurate, but if it is, consider this irony: those faculty who cooperate in this way with Sci-Hub seem to be the same ones that complain about this new
technology invading their privacy. But as I understand it, having passwords to use in accessing the journals also gives Sci-Hub the opportunity to access a great range of other materials in universities' computer systems, like student grades, etc., which would
then be an invasion of THEIR privacy. Sci-Hub may proclaim that it is only using such access identities to acquire access to journals, but who is to say what Sci-Hub may be doing with the other information that those passwords allow it to acquire? Should
one really trust an entity whose leader admits to being an old-style Marxist who wants to bring down capitalism?
Sandy Thatcher
From: "Jim O'Donnell" <
[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:22:14 -0700
Seen on Jim Neal's Facebook page, this link outlines a complicated and inevitably controversial idea about controlling the use of intellectual property licensed to libraries. The discussion inevitably becomes one of whether and how to push back against
SciHub, complicated by concerns over privacy and academic freedom.
I find this interesting because SciHub has always claimed that they use "borrowed" legitimate credentials to access and download for redistribution articles from research libraries. Has there ever been confirmation that this is in fact the practice they
use? Nothing about SciHub's self-representations seems credible enough to take at face value. But if that practice is not in fact a problem or not widespread then this proposal would lose some of its usefulness.
Jim O'Donnell
ASU