From: Klaus Graf <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:05:25 +0100
2012/1/10 LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>:
> From: David Prosser <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 12:19:16 +0000
>
> 'Free access' and 'open access' are not synonymous terms. If they
> were then the framers of the definitions of open access from Budapest
> onwards could have saved their time crafting definitions. Open access
> is free access plus. Open access is always free access, but free
> access is not always open access.
>
> What Sandy describes, free reading on screen but nothing else, may be
> valuable, but it is not open access. It is free access.
I agree. Only libre Access (re-use allowed) is true Open Access.
Klaus Graf